Navigating the New Normal: How China's Overproduction Impacts Battery Metal Prices and Taiwan's Position

This is the third in a series of posts about the China-Taiwan relationship and its effects on global supply chains.

‍

2023 saw a significant shift in the global market for lithium, nickel, and other battery metals. Prices for these materials, crucial in the manufacturing of batteries for everything from smartphones to electric vehicles, plummeted. Lithium in particular has taken a hit, down 80% from a late-2022 high, while nickel has fallen 40%. Given the symbiotic and sometimes competitive relationship across the Taiwan Strait, this has profound implications for Taiwan, also a major player in the battery and EV technology markets. 

‍

In recent years, Beijing has aggressively ramped up production of lithium-iron (LFP) cathodes., a move driven by the country's ambitious goals to lead in the electric vehicle (EV) market and renewable energy sector. However, this surge in production, combined with slower-than-expected demand for EV vehicles, has led to an oversupply in the LFP market for two years running, causing prices to drop substantially.

‍

While Taiwan doesn’t have the LFP production capability that China does - though it has been working to increase capacity -  it is nonetheless a crucial link in the production chain. Taiwan’s tech R&D sector influences the battery industry, and Taiwan is the world’s dominant force in semiconductor production.

‍

To stabilize the market and keep prices from bottoming out completely, China will likely have to slow the pace of LFP manufacturing. But with months of surplus inventory sitting in warehouses this is not a situation likely to resolve quickly, and in the meantime China and Taiwan will have to navigate an evolving landscape.

‍

Dependency and Strategic Vulnerability

Taiwan might evaluate its dependency on China in the context of critical supply chains, including those related to EVs and battery technology. Taiwanese companies may realign their strategies, and such adjustments could influence the broader trade and economic relations between the two.

‍

Technological and Industrial Rivalry

The situation might accelerate a technological and industrial rivalry between Taiwan and China, particularly in advanced technology sectors like EVs and renewable energy. Taiwan, known for its high-tech industries, might increase investment in research and development to maintain a competitive edge. Taiwanese companies are already  pursuing investment in non-lithium battery technology, which could lead to a tech race with China. 

‍

Collaboration Opportunities

Despite competitive dynamics, there might be opportunities for collaboration in areas like technology exchange, joint ventures, or co-development projects, particularly if such cooperation can lead to mutual economic benefits.

‍

Boost for Renewable Energy Projects 

Despite Taiwan’s place as a tech leader, its energy production is among the dirtiest in the region, with 80% of Taiwan’s electricity coming from fossil fuels. It hopes to change that in the near future, aiming to achieve a substantial portion of its energy mix from renewable sources by 2030. Cheaper battery metals could accelerate the development of energy storage solutions, a critical component for managing intermittent renewable energy sources like solar and wind.

‍

Geopolitical Implications

The EV battery market is just one facet of the broader geopolitical tensions between China and Taiwan. If Taiwan develops new technologies and pursues new alliances in an effort to economically distance itself from China, tensions and saber-rattling across the Strait could draw other nations into the dispute.

‍

While the plummeting prices of battery metals due to China's overproduction present immediate cost benefits, they also bring to the fore the need for strategic planning and innovation. For Taiwan, it's an opportunity to bolster its EV and renewable energy sectors by capitalizing on lower costs. However, it must also navigate the challenges of market volatility, geopolitical complexities, and competitive pressures.

‍